To define insanity clinically or legally would require extensive research—perhaps even a thesis or dissertation. But in a general sense, insanity is seldom permanent. It’s often a fleeting state of mental instability marked by delusion, lack of reason, derangement, irresistible impulse, or psychosis.

In the news this morning (September 25), we were given a striking example of what could be called temporary insanity. A pregnant woman was hospitalized and placed on a respirator after overdosing on Tylenol—not for a high fever or an unbearable headache, but as a political protest. A government leader she despises had recently cited medical findings suggesting a link between Tylenol use during pregnancy and autism. In defiance, she consumed a dangerously high dose of the drug to “prove him wrong”—endangering not only herself but the baby she’s carrying.

This type of reaction raises serious questions. Should we wait for causal proof before sounding the alarm? Or is correlation strong enough to warrant caution? Remember—if we had waited for causal evidence linking cigarettes to cancer, doctors might still be recommending their favorite brands of tobacco.

As a nation, we have been instructed, pressured, and even mandated to comply with increasingly aggressive vaccine schedules—despite a lack of long-term safety studies and without any public discussion of the pharmaceutical industry's influence on these mandates. What financial incentives exist for healthcare providers to maintain full compliance? What pressures are placed on public health agencies? Why haven’t we studied the long-term effects of vaccines in children—particularly comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated populations?

Thankfully, with the development of advanced A.I. tools, some researchers have begun to fill this gap. A recent study analyzed medical records to separate children into vaccinated and unvaccinated groups and tracked chronic disease outcomes over time. The findings are staggering:

57% of vaccinated children were diagnosed with chronic diseases such as asthma, autoimmune conditions, eczema, atopic disorders, and neurodevelopmental challenges.

 

In contrast, only 17% of unvaccinated children were found to have chronic conditions.

 

(Source: Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children – A Birth Cohort Study)

These findings deserve our attention—especially as the medical establishment continues to assert that “vaccines don’t cause autism.” The truth is, they have no studies proving they don’t. Meanwhile, there is a plethora of data showing correlation. Once again, as with tobacco, are we going to wait for irrefutable causal proof before acting?

Autism is now an epidemic. It is time to set aside medical politics and examine all possibilities with honesty and urgency.

As we do so, we may find that the history of vaccination is not what we've been told. At the very least, let’s keep an eye on Florida—a state that has declared vaccine mandates are no longer required. I believe Florida will survive the freedom of choice.